HOMEPAGE
Expect the Unexpected
By Marydee Ojala Editor |
My reading habits, as I suspect is true of many information
professionals, are eclectic verging on eccentric. If
you looked in my (physical) mailbox, you'd find magazines
devoted to librarianship, information technology, pharmaceutical
industry, computers, travel, audio, video, news, arts,
culture, geography, photography, business, and journalism.
One personality characteristic that draws people
to our field is insatiable curiosity. We are the grownup
equivalent of the small child constantly asking, "Why?" Rather
than irritating our parents with incessant questioning,
we turn to the Internet, which never answers with a
frustrated, "Just because, that's why!"
In the world of the curious, pattern matching is
second nature. When the same type of story surfaces
in technical magazines, professional library journals, and today's
news, we recognize a trend. Some of these intersections
are not all that surprising. When doing a bit of background
research on RFID for an upcoming meeting of the Indiana
Online Users Group (IOLUG), I expected to find articles
on library and retail stores' use of the technology.
I expected the technical aspects of RFID to show up
in the computer press. The similarities between retailing
and a circulating library collection are frequently
overlooked by information professionals, and I've often
thought over the past few decades that we're far ahead
of the technologists in applying technology. Public
policy issues surrounding the technology were more
common than I expected, however, indicating that our
adoption of RFID should be cautious.
When articles about Google moved from the technology
and library magazines to the general press, what I
expected was superficiality, naiveté, confusion,
and misinformation. I was not disappointed. However,
I've also been pleasantly surprised to read some in-depth,
extremely accurate explanations of both the technology
and specific Web site informational resources. One
particularly impressive one, I realized when I checked
the byline, was written by the magazine's librarian.
Well no wonder it was correct and authoritative! I
loved the article, written for journalists, bemoaning
their lack of rigor in challenging government's removal
of information and chiding them for not following the
lead of librarians in challenging The PATRIOT Act.
What really grabs my attention is when I'm reading
an interesting article and suddenly realize it's in
a publication I didn't expect: an article about hacking
in a customer relations magazine; methods to determine
student plagiarism in a news magazine; or highly credible
Web resources in a photography magazine This is the
type of serendipity we appreciate when searching large
aggregators such as LexisNexis. It's the "I didn't
know that group was interested in this" syndrome,
which is frequently the trigger to refine a search
strategy or investigate alternative sources. Expecting
the unexpected comes naturally to experienced researchers,
but might be confusing to novices. Leaving ourselves
open to serendipitous results, not restricting our
searches to where we think the answer is, and relying
on our instincts, not just logic, are important information
professional behaviors.
Marydee
Ojala [marydee@xmission.com] is
the editor of ONLINE. Comments? E-mail letters
to the editor to marydee@xmission.com. |