DEPARTMENT 
                        LETTER TO THE EDITOR                          
                         Copyright Claims and Trademark
    Usage
 I read with some interest your article about The Library Hotel in the December
  2003 issue of Information Today. I agree that it was indeed a funny
  lawsuit on its face, but I don't really think that it is all that controversial.
  Mostly, the Dewey Decimal Classification system makes for good humor for the
  general public (librarians included).
  I was disappointed that your article didn't make a distinction between the
  copyright claims and those involving trademark usage. You note that "Considering
  that the DDC is 130 years old, you would think the classification scheme is
  in the public domain." Indeed it's "[n]ot true" as you state, but for different
  reasons than you seem to imply.
  The system itself may have passed into public domain for some purposes. Melvil
  Dewey certainly has no patent rights, and even in our post-Sonny Bono atmosphere,
  his original system has no chance of copyright protection. However, this is
  a trademark issue, and trademarks can last (potentially) forever. The importance
  of it being in use for 130 years is that it has been in use in interstate commerce,
  connected with products and services. This is the hallmark of trademark protection.
  If OCLC didn't exercise their rights to protect their valid, incontestable
  trademarks, they might be lost. They need to "police" their marks, lest they
  be surrendered to the public.
  Thankfully, the lawsuit has been settled, so we don't need to worry about
  the thorny issues of trademark dilution, let alone a battle between a kind-hearted
  nonprofit and a shiny for-profit hotel in New York. At best, I think that this
  lawsuit got The Library Hotel some publicity and it allowed OCLC to get some
  deserved licensing fees for use of their trademarks. Unfortunately, OCLC got
  some bad press in the process, but it could have been worse for them, I suppose.
  Too bad it didn't bring to light more interesting distinctions of the types
  of intellectual property actually involved.
  For what it's worth, I wrote a short piece on the lawsuit back in September.
  I thought that the Bliss Classification System might be a good alternative,
  but I doubt that they'll change now (http://www.llrx.com/features/deweyoclc.htm).
  Roger V. Skalbeck  
  Technology Librarian 
  George Mason University School of Law
  
 
  |